The statement critiques legacy media, implying a predictable pattern in their coverage. It references a specific article about a political figure's change in stance, suggesting skepticism about the media's portrayal.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies criticism of media practices.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but could be seen as dismissive of media efforts. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is critical but lacks constructive dialogue or specific examples. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.