The statement expresses concern over Australia's implementation of digital ID and age checks, framing it as a threat to freedom and privacy. It criticizes past COVID policies, suggesting a pattern of restrictive measures.
- The statement uses strong language that could incite fear, potentially causing harm by spreading alarmist views. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but criticizes government actions, which could be seen as a form of public accountability rather than harassment.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism of policies but does not offer constructive solutions or engage in dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.