Bret Baier

The statement critiques legacy media for not proactively investigating and exposing fraud in Minnesota, suggesting that media outlets only reported on the issue after government investigations. It implies a need for more investigative journalism and accountability in media practices.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm others but critiques media practices, which is a part of healthy public discourse.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a perceived gap in media accountability and the importance of investigative journalism. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism of media practices without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   By calling for better media practices, the statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment through improved journalism. [+1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing media practices and encouraging accountability. [+1]