In reply to:
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing vaccine safety and public health recommendations. It supports the elimination of mercury from flu vaccines and separating MMRV doses to reduce seizure risks, aligning with scientific advocacy. The reply thanks an individual for supporting science, indicating a positive tone towards evidence-based practices.
- The statement supports scientific recommendations, aiming to reduce harm by advocating for safer vaccine practices. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding and empathy by supporting evidence-based health decisions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages constructively by thanking someone for their stance, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.