Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement by Ilan Pappé engages in public discourse by addressing historical and geopolitical issues related to the establishment of Israel and the Holocaust. It critiques the decision to establish a Jewish state in Palestine, suggesting an alternative solution involving Germany. The tone is critical and provocative, aiming to challenge conventional narratives about the founding of Israel.
- The statement could be seen as potentially harmful as it revisits sensitive historical events and proposes a controversial alternative, which might offend some groups. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a divisive opinion without fostering dialogue or reconciliation between affected parties. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning historical decisions, but it lacks a balanced dialogue or consideration of multiple perspectives.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.