Karen says I told you so🌹
@Airstrip_0ne
·
28d
The statement questions the validity of Julie Brown's claim about being monitored, suggesting a lack of investigative effort on her part. The tone is skeptical and critical, focusing on the accuracy of her reporting.
- The statement does not directly harm but questions the credibility of a journalist, which could indirectly affect her reputation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not disclosing personal information but challenges the dignity of the journalist by questioning her professionalism. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on discrediting the journalist's claims. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.