Karen says I told you so🌹
@Airstrip_0ne
·
27d
The statement and conversation involve a critique of media narratives and reporting on the Epstein case, questioning the integrity and motives of journalists involved. The tone is skeptical and confrontational, with implications of bias and misinformation.
- The statement questions the integrity of reporting, which could be seen as harmful if it undermines trust without evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation involves accusations that could affect the dignity of journalists and victims, potentially violating privacy and respect. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism and skepticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The dialogue is confrontational and lacks constructive criticism, leaning towards personal attacks. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.