Matt Taibbi

Rank 21 of 47

Score 40

I’m against the IHRA definition and even bans of boycotts, but if I were still a New Yorker I’d probably prefer he focus on my city on day one instead of deleting tweets about Israel

sportsandpolitics

@FreetheTruth17

24d

@mtaibbi You wouldnt actually. It would be so obvious a criticism you wouldnt feel it was worth your time to write anything about it. So, any comment on his revoking of the IHRA order, or his actual policies? Actions are more important than words and more critical to a serious analysis

1/2/2026, 8:19:56 PM

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the IHRA definition, boycotts, and political priorities, which are public issues. The tone is critical and suggests a preference for local governance over international matters. The statement implies a critique of political actions and priorities, contributing to civic dialogue.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of political actions, which is a part of healthy discourse.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on critique rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on actions and policies. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds free speech by expressing a personal opinion on public matters, using the platform responsibly. [+1]