The statement critiques the influence of activist groups on journalistic language, suggesting a need for independent guidelines. It uses strong language to express frustration with current practices.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as dismissive, potentially causing harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of those advocating for inclusive language, potentially engaging in dismissive rhetoric. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards the groups advocating for language changes. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, using a dismissive tone. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.