Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses a proposal by Trump allies for the design of a new stadium, referencing classical antiquity. It touches on urban planning and architectural design, which can be considered a public issue as it involves public spaces and community impact.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is focused on architectural design.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does engage in a discussion about design philosophy.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement uses influence to discuss a public issue related to urban planning and design, which can contribute to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing a design proposal and uses the platform to engage in a public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.