Steve Scalise

Rank 33 of 47

Score -16

-1

Under Tim Walz, Minnesota officials were PART of the fraudulent schemes!

Records were backdated to justify $680,000 in taxpayer funds to a grantee with no proof of work.

The state employee who approved it? Walked straight into a job with the same grantee.

1/8/2026, 9:24:28 PM

In reply to:

Steve Scalise

@SteveScalise

10d

Tim Walz KNEW about widespread theft of taxpayer dollars but did NOTHING to stop it.

@RepBrandonGill: When did he know about it?

MN State Rep. Robbins: From the very beginning

Gill: What was the Walz Administration’s response?

Robbins: They did nothing.

Steve Scalise

@SteveScalise

10d

🚨 ICYMI: @GOPoversight exposed the TRUE scale of Minnesota’s fraud crisis.

Backdated records. Missing money. No accountability.

What we saw wasn’t a mistake — it was SYSTEMIC FAILURE.

🎥 WATCH the key moments ⬇️

The statement and conversation involve allegations of fraud and mismanagement in Minnesota, implicating public officials and suggesting systemic issues. The tone is accusatory and critical, aiming to hold officials accountable.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to expose wrongdoing, which could be seen as striving to prevent harm by addressing alleged corruption. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The accusatory nature may not fully respect the privacy and dignity of those involved, as it makes serious allegations without presenting evidence in this context. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in criticism of public officials, which is constructive if based on evidence, but risks being seen as a personal attack without substantiation. [-1]