The statement 'Genocide is wrong. But I imagine you weren’t being literal' is part of a public discourse as it engages with a broader societal issue, namely the moral stance on genocide, in response to a conversation about accountability in police actions. The tone is somewhat dismissive, suggesting that the original comment about genocide was not meant to be taken seriously.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the dismissive tone towards a serious issue like genocide could be seen as trivializing it, which might indirectly cause harm by undermining the gravity of the topic. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not fully respect the dignity of the original commenter by dismissing their concern.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses a serious moral stance without engaging with it meaningfully. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the original comment rather than addressing it substantively. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.