The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the perceived bias in reactions to different incidents involving violence and death. It challenges the consistency of moral and political judgments across different scenarios.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as accusatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the integrity of others' views, which could be seen as disrespectful, though it does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on highlighting perceived bias rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism but does so in a way that could be perceived as a personal attack, rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.