The statement critiques academic race theories and a political figure's support for them, using strong language like 'crazy,' 'loony,' and 'evil.' This tone suggests a dismissive and confrontational approach.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The use of derogatory language may contribute to harm by dismissing complex academic discussions without constructive engagement.
[-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement lacks respect for the dignity of those involved by using pejorative terms, which could be seen as a form of verbal attack.
[-2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The language used does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses the theories without explanation or dialogue.
[-2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, opting instead for personal attacks and ad hominem arguments.
[-2]