Reposted by J.K. Rowling
The statement expresses a strong opinion against the use of puberty blockers on healthy young children, referencing a petition and a government-sanctioned trial. It engages with a public issue concerning medical ethics and child safety, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement aims to prevent harm by opposing the use of puberty blockers on children, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it presents a strong opinion without engaging with opposing views.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue with those in disagreement, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging other perspectives. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for the safety of children, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on a public issue, using the platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.