Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement by Rahm, as reported by Axios, constitutes public discourse as it engages with political dynamics within a party, discussing the existence of different factions and expressing an intent to influence one of them. This touches on public issues related to political strategy and party dynamics.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the competitive language could potentially contribute to divisiveness within the party.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on domination rather than collaboration. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not foster constructive dialogue either, as it emphasizes domination over cooperation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to assert dominance within a political faction, which may not necessarily be for the betterment of society if it leads to increased division. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express political strategy, but the responsibility and integrity of the message could be questioned if it leads to internal conflict.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.