Bret Baier

The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue related to national security and foreign policy. It announces a policy decision regarding the designation of certain chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist organizations, which has implications for international relations and domestic security.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could potentially do harm by labeling specific groups as terrorist organizations, which might lead to increased tensions or violence. However, it is framed as a protective measure for U.S. citizens. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does label specific groups as terrorist organizations, which could impact their dignity. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on eliminating perceived threats rather than fostering dialogue or understanding. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue with those in disagreement, as it is a unilateral declaration without room for discussion. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to assert a policy stance aimed at national security, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by protecting citizens. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to communicate a policy decision, though the responsibility and integrity of this decision could be debated. [+1]