The statement questions the intent behind a supposed motto of homeland security, suggesting a confrontational stance. It raises concerns about whether the focus is on conflict or resolution.
- The statement challenges a perceived aggressive stance, potentially aiming to prevent harm by questioning it. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It seeks to promote understanding by questioning the intent behind the motto. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue by posing a question rather than making an accusation. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.