In reply to:
臑H掳$扭
@opp_ghost
路
15d
David Sacks
@DavidSacks
路
15d
Geiger Capital
@Geiger_Capital
路
15d
The statement is part of a conversation about the potential implications of a proposed wealth tax in California and its broader political ramifications. The tone is sarcastic, as indicated by the use of the laughing emoji, and it seems to criticize the cyclical nature of political funding and policy support.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the sarcastic tone could contribute to a dismissive attitude towards the issue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.聽[+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses sarcasm rather than constructive dialogue.聽[-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive criticism.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech but does not use the platform to responsibly engage with the issue in a substantive way.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.