Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement presents a critical view of the US-Israel relationship, suggesting it is responsible for violence against various groups. The tone is accusatory and foreboding, highlighting concerns about international and domestic policies.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, as it accuses specific nations of murder without providing evidence, potentially inciting fear or anger. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it generalizes and attributes negative actions to entire nations, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on blame and fear rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes broad accusations without engaging with opposing views or providing evidence. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness of perceived injustices, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal betterment due to its accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or constructive, given its lack of evidence and accusatory nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.