Reposted by Steve Scalise
The statement criticizes the Biden-Harris Administration's approach to retirement savings and ESG funds, framing it as a political move to appease environmentalists. It promotes a legislative action by House Republicans to counter this approach.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as divisive, potentially causing harm by framing the issue in a highly partisan manner. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does use charged language that could undermine respectful discourse.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a confrontational way. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does use a partisan tone that may not foster constructive dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.