Jill Stien

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -104

The statement is critical of Trump, using strong language to express disapproval of his actions and legacy. It references ICE and implies negative historical significance. The accompanying image provides data on presidential approval ratings, adding context to the critique.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses harsh language, which may not promote understanding or empathy, potentially violating this principle. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual it criticizes, potentially violating this principle. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is critical but does not engage in constructive dialogue, potentially violating this principle. [-1]