Jill Stien

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -104

The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the global response to it. The tone is critical and accusatory, highlighting perceived injustices and lack of international attention.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by using sarcasm and potentially inflaming tensions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of those involved, using a sarcastic tone that could be seen as dismissive. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead using sarcasm to criticize. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, opting for sarcasm over reasoned argument. [-2]