Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement involves a direct threat from a senior IRGC commander towards a former U.S. President, which constitutes public discourse as it engages with international relations and security issues.
- The statement violates the principle of doing no harm by issuing a violent threat. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement disrespects the dignity of others and could be considered a form of verbal aggression. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, instead escalating tensions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.