Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critical commentary on a proposed Israeli legislative action, using charged language to express opposition to the bill and perceived inaction by Western countries. It engages in public discourse by addressing a significant political and human rights issue.
- The statement uses inflammatory language ('barbarism' and 'bestiality') which could be seen as harmful and escalatory, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The use of terms like 'barbarism' and 'bestiality' can be interpreted as hate speech, violating the principle of respecting dignity and avoiding hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses divisive and aggressive language. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks and inflammatory language. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity due to its inflammatory nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.