Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques Israel's actions by highlighting alleged past use of white phosphorus in Lebanon and questions its stance on human rights in Iran. The tone is accusatory and skeptical, aiming to challenge the credibility of Israel's human rights advocacy.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by potentially inflaming tensions and not promoting peace. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in hate speech but could be seen as disrespectful by questioning motives without constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead making a pointed accusation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.