The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the implications of a proposed California wealth tax on startup founders and appraisers, suggesting potential negative consequences. It raises concerns about the tax's impact on individuals and businesses, contributing to a broader debate on taxation policy.
- The statement uses strong language ('bankrupt you' and 'personally punish') which could be seen as alarmist, potentially causing harm by inciting fear among stakeholders. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, thus respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on the negative consequences without offering constructive solutions or fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive criticism or dialogue, focusing instead on the potential negative outcomes.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by discussing a public policy issue, but it could use its platform more responsibly by providing a balanced view or encouraging informed debate. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.