The statement and image suggest a comparison of media coverage on ICE under different administrations, implying a potential bias or change in reporting style. The tone is critical and invites viewers to notice differences, possibly encouraging skepticism about media consistency.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies criticism of media practices.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on perceived inconsistencies. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement encourages critical thinking about media but could lead to divisive interpretations.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.