Elon Musk

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -62

The statement addresses a public issue related to national security and foreign policy, specifically concerning the appellate ruling on Mahmoud Khalil. It takes a strong stance against those perceived as sympathizing with terrorists, framing it as a matter of national interest.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, particularly in labeling individuals as sympathizers of terrorism without nuance, potentially inciting fear or hostility. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of those it addresses, as it broadly categorizes individuals as terrorist sympathizers, which could be seen as a form of hate speech. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it takes a divisive stance without encouraging dialogue or understanding of differing perspectives. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead making broad generalizations and personal attacks against those it disagrees with. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses its platform to express a strong opinion on a public issue, but it does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible by not fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]