The statement critiques media coverage of ICE, suggesting a shift in narrative from the Obama era to the present, implying media bias. It questions the consistency and motives behind media reporting, framing it as agenda-driven rather than fact-based.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies media bias, which could polarize opinions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticizing media motives. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on perceived media inconsistency. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.