Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement claims that Michael Cohen was coerced by prosecutors to testify against Trump, suggesting misconduct in legal proceedings. It implies a significant shift in a legal case, which could influence public opinion and trust in the justice system.
- The statement could potentially harm individuals' reputations by suggesting coercion without providing evidence. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It may not respect the privacy and dignity of those involved by making serious allegations publicly. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without context. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it makes accusations without inviting discussion or providing evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.