Reposted by J.K. Rowling
The statement critiques UNISON's response to a legal ruling involving gender and privacy issues. It highlights a perceived discrepancy between the union's membership demographics and its stance on the tribunal ruling.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm to women by questioning the union's stance on privacy and safety. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It challenges the union's respect for privacy and dignity by focusing on the implications of the tribunal ruling. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by encouraging dialogue on gender rights and privacy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the union's response without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.