Reposted by Bret Baier
Dan Orlovsky
@danorlovsky7
·
10d
The statement expresses disagreement with a referee's decision in an NFL game, suggesting that a contested catch should have been ruled in favor of the wide receiver. It reflects frustration over the decision's impact on the game's outcome.
- The statement does not cause harm but expresses a strong opinion on a sports ruling.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of the decision but does not attack individuals personally. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.