Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinš»
The statement addresses significant public issues related to international law, human rights, and geopolitical conflicts, specifically focusing on the situation in Gaza. It presents a strong opinion on the legality of actions by Israel and the US, using terms like 'occupation' and 'genocide,' which are charged and carry significant implications.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than promoting peace or understanding. This could be considered a violation of the principle to do no harm with words.Ā [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of terms like 'genocide' could be interpreted as inflammatory and may not fully respect the dignity of those involved in the conflict.Ā [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it takes a strong accusatory stance without offering a path to dialogue or resolution.Ā [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging potential counterarguments or engaging with opposing perspectives.Ā [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by addressing a contentious issue, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform could be questioned due to the use of charged language without providing a balanced view.Ā [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.