Jill Stien

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -121

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing societal issues related to racism, militarism, and materialism, and connects these issues to the situation in Palestine. It invokes the legacy of Martin Luther King Jr. to make a point about contemporary geopolitical issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as doing harm by using charged language such as 'genocide' and 'ethnic cleansing,' which may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement risks disrespecting the dignity of others by labeling a group as 'Zionist public enemy #1,' which could be interpreted as hate speech. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses divisive language rather than seeking common ground. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a strong accusation without inviting discussion or considering opposing views. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to highlight a societal issue, but the approach may not contribute to the betterment of society due to its divisive nature. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly, as it could incite division rather than promote integrity. [-1]