Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement reports on a significant legal development involving grand jury subpoenas related to alleged conspiracy to impede federal law enforcement. It mentions public officials and government offices, indicating a substantive engagement with public issues and legal processes.
- The statement is factual and does not appear to cause harm through its content. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech, though it does name public officials involved in the legal process. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is neutral and does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing on the legal process. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By reporting on legal proceedings, the statement uses its platform to inform the public, potentially contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly reporting on a matter of public interest. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.