The statement involves a historical and political debate about party positions on civil rights, which is a public issue. Julie's comment suggests a criticism of the GOP by referencing historical events, while Scott counters by pointing out historical Democratic opposition to civil rights. The exchange is confrontational and lacks constructive dialogue.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it involves accusatory language. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The exchange does not respect the dignity of others, as it involves blame and historical accusations. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on past grievances rather than current solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The dialogue is not constructive and involves personal attacks rather than addressing the issue substantively. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.