Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement involves a historical reference to World War II, emphasizing American strength and its role in Greenland's security. It appears to be a political statement aimed at highlighting U.S. influence and military power.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as nationalistic, which might not promote global unity.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on military strength rather than cooperation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but could be seen as dismissive of other nations' contributions.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.