Bret Baier

The statement discusses US defense spending compared to NATO allies, suggesting a disparity in financial priorities. It implies criticism of European NATO members for prioritizing welfare over defense, and questions their gratitude towards the US. The tone is somewhat confrontational and implies a sense of entitlement to gratitude.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could be seen as causing harm by fostering division between the US and its NATO allies. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not engage in direct harassment but implies criticism of NATO allies' spending priorities.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing instead on financial contributions rather than collaborative defense efforts. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead using a rhetorical question to imply criticism. [-1]