More Perfect Union
@MorePerfectUS
·
8d
The statement 'King of Fraud' in response to a conversation about Donald Trump's financial gains during his presidency constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning the ethics and legality of a public figure's actions while in office.
- The statement 'King of Fraud' could be seen as harmful as it labels an individual with a negative term without providing evidence, potentially causing reputational damage. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual it targets, as it uses a derogatory term without substantiation, which could be considered a form of harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to a personal attack rather than addressing the issue with reasoned argumentation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly, as it uses a platform to make an unsubstantiated claim that could mislead or inflame public opinion. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.