Jill Stien

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -121

The statement is a fictional and provocative scenario that references historical figures and events in a way that could be considered inflammatory and misleading. It appears to be a satirical or hyperbolic commentary on current political issues, using historical references to make a point about perceived injustices or controversies. The tone is sensational and likely intended to provoke a strong emotional reaction.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could cause harm by trivializing historical atrocities and using them for shock value.Ā [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It disrespects the dignity of individuals and groups by making light of serious historical events and figures.Ā [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses inflammatory language and comparisons.Ā [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for sensationalism and potential personal attacks.Ā [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does not use free speech responsibly, as it spreads potentially harmful and misleading information.Ā [-2]