Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinš»
The statement criticizes Western leaders and media for allegedly changing their stance on international order due to political pressures, specifically mentioning Trump's threats against Greenland. It also references a conversation about international law and Israel's actions. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting a failure in upholding international norms.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm.Ā [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It criticizes specific groups, which could be seen as disrespectful, though it does not engage in direct hate speech.Ā [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism.Ā [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on accusations rather than solutions.Ā [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.