Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes Democratic Party politicians for allegedly sharing the same agenda as Wall Street and war, suggesting a lack of opposition to Trump. It implies systemic issues within the party, including local politicians. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived political failures.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by making broad accusations without specific evidence, potentially contributing to divisive rhetoric. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue or specific examples, which could lead to personal attacks rather than productive discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.