In reply to:
Farhad Nawab
@FarhadNawab
·
17d
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
17d
The statement is part of a conversation discussing the evolving role of education and its relevance in today's job market, which is a public issue. The tone is critical of traditional education systems, suggesting they are outdated and financially burdensome.
- The statement does not cause harm; it critiques a system rather than individuals.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the mismatch between education and job market needs. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by building on previous comments without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to question and potentially improve societal norms around education. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to discuss public concerns about education. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.