Reposted by Justin Batt
The statement reflects a defensive tone, listing grievances about being labeled negatively for supporting certain political figures and positions. It suggests a pattern of perceived unfair treatment by others, likely aimed at highlighting what the speaker sees as unjust criticism from opposing viewpoints.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies that the speaker feels harmed by being labeled negatively. It does not strive to avoid harm but rather highlights perceived harm done to the speaker's group. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of those who may hold opposing views, as it dismisses their criticisms as mere labels. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It focuses on perceived personal attacks rather than addressing the underlying issues or engaging with opposing arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.