Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement involves a critique of political rhetoric and its potential impact, which is a public issue. It questions the consistency of calls to reduce rhetoric while engaging in criticism, highlighting a potential contradiction.
- The statement challenges the consistency of rhetoric reduction, which could contribute to reducing harm if it encourages more thoughtful discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By questioning the rhetoric, it could promote understanding and empathy if it leads to more balanced discussions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a perceived inconsistency, which can foster dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.