Peter Diamandis

Rank 5 of 47

Score 180

@yoemsri yes, exactly. As I’m setting up a moltbot I’m thinking about making sure it doesn’t get turned off. Moral issues. And agreed slavery is not something I would ever support in any form.

1/31/2026, 9:49:18 PM

In reply to:

Youssef El Manssouri

@yoemsri

@PeterDiamandis Argument Against: Economics.

If AI has personhood, deleting a model is murder and prompting it is forced labor.

The trillion-dollar business model relies on them being property. We literally cannot afford to let them be people.

Peter H. Diamandis, MD

@PeterDiamandis

Time for the AI personhood debate! What are the arguments for AI personhood? Who wants to argue against it?
looking forward to reading your thoughts and comments

The statement engages in a discussion about AI personhood, touching on moral and ethical considerations, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is thoughtful and reflective, acknowledging the complexity of the issue and expressing a clear stance against slavery in any form.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by explicitly rejecting the concept of slavery, aligning with the principle of causing no harm with words and actions. [+2]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding and empathy by considering the moral implications of AI personhood and expressing a commitment to ethical considerations. [+2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding thoughtfully to a previous comment, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]