Mike Johnson

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing immigration policy and its moral implications, referencing religious texts to justify a political stance. It presents a viewpoint on the ethical considerations of border control.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement attempts to justify a political stance using religious reasoning, which may not directly harm but could polarize opinions.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement uses religious language to promote understanding of a political stance, but it may not foster empathy or compassion for those affected by deportations. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather presents a justification for a policy, allowing for potential constructive dialogue. [+1]