The statement by @yunta_tsai presents a comparison between engineers and journalists, suggesting that engineers are accountable to the immutable laws of physics, while journalists are accountable to humans, who can be influenced or corrupted. This statement engages in public discourse by addressing the integrity and accountability of professions, which is a societal issue.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it implies a negative view of journalists, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does generalize about journalists in a way that could be seen as disrespectful to their dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it sets up a dichotomy that could foster mistrust in journalism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without inviting discussion or considering counterarguments. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.