Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 267

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the New York Post's coverage of a new project aimed at countering disinformation, which is a significant public issue. The statement also references a specific initiative, The American Sunlight Project, which further substantiates its engagement with public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses derogatory language ('idiotic, one-sided trashing') which could be seen as harmful, violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the public actions of a newspaper and a project without targeting individuals' private lives. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks a tone of understanding, empathy, or compassion, particularly in its harsh critique of the New York Post, thus not fully promoting these qualities.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a personal attack on the New York Post ('idiotic, one-sided trashing'), which detracts from constructive criticism or dialogue. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement supports a project aimed at bettering society by countering disinformation, aligning with using influence for societal betterment. [+1]